Total Pageviews

Friday, December 20, 2013

Age of Desire: Discussion Notes and an Email Correspondence with Author

In a comfortable 1870's wood-frame townhouse in front of a charming fire in a wood burning stove, among a 12-member book group with maybe two e-readers in all, technology in the form of Skype brought author Jennie Fields into our meeting. Generous. Warm. Intelligent. Ms. Fields was everything that member B.B.said she was when she was B.B.'s writing mentor almost a decade ago.  (Sessions were held in the Barnes and Noble on 7th Avenue.   I probably was not the only one who wondered why I didn't attend. What was I so busy with?)  And we found out that Ms. Fields was a neighbor—just two blocks away from where we were last night.



Briefly...

Some things we said last night before the call...

Members discussed how Edith Wharton's transformative love affair at 46 was as adolescent as any crush felt by a fourteen year old. And so with most adolescent crushes—it didn't matter who the object was. Even a promiscuous seducer like Morton Fullerton. Wharton's relationship with her husband, Teddy, was a shallow thing easily destroyed. Of the characters in Age of Desire, the only deep relationship she had was with Anna, her servant, her tutor, her governess, her editor, her typist.

During the call, some things we learned from the author...


All of Edith Wharton's letters in the book are actual letters—they are the framework for the Age of Desire. Edith's letters to Morton Fullerton were rescued/taken at gunpoint by a woman. (Morton remained single and a scoundrel, blackmailed more than once, until his death  in the 1950's in his 8th decade. He never destroyed or returned the letters as asked. Fields speculated that he knew that they were valuable.)

In addition-something—serendipity? a dead soul's desire? a lucky break?--brought another set of letters to Ms. Fields just as she was fact checking her final draft of Age of Desire. The letters were Anna's. And, their contents confirmed Ms. Fields' intuition and speculation about Anna and her dealings with the Whartons.   Anna wanted to...more than that...desired to serve Edith...to make her happy...and to contribute to Edith's work. And she alone was able to soothe and comfort Teddy through his early bipolar episodes.

Don't judge historic figures by modern sensibilities.Edith's use of Anna...seemed despicable to some members--well at least one--this blogger.  It isn't fair to judge Edith for doing what the upper class of her period did with their servants. Nor is it fair to expect better behavior from women of genius than we expect from men of genius.

To the romantics in the group, it was good to learn that Edith most likely found love with Walter Berry...her early and enduring love. She called him "the love of her life".  

WHAT FOLLOWS, fittingly, is a correspondence between B.B. and Jennie Fields...

Hi Jennie,

Thanks so much for spending time with us this evening.  (I can hardly believe Skype worked out given our amateur approach on this end!)  Everyone agreed that meeting and talking with you topped off our discussion beautifully and made the book all the more impressive.  After we said goodbye to you, I thought to ask the others what they thought of the sex scenes and everyone laughed appreciatively and said they wished we'd told you how great they were.


Thanks again for this evening!

B.B.

Hi B.B.

I loved talking to your book group.  I'm glad they enjoyed it.  Too bad you didn't bring up the sex scenes.  I would have shared that among Edith's papers when she died was some extremely explicit erotica she'd written and kept hidden which helped me understand her sexuality. It gave me the courage to write those scenes.  If she could write hot scenes, hey, why couldn't I?

Thanks for inviting me, and thank everyone for taking the time to read my book.  If they find extra reading time, you might mention that Crossing Brooklyn Ferry and The Middle Ages are both set in Park Slope. (Must be all those years in advertising.  I'm always selling!)

Jennie

Outtakes with literary references and a reading suggestion...

Jennie:

BTW: I know that Edith meant May in "Innocence" to be a horrible example of repression, but I am intrigued by how she is presented: telling Newland he's free to break their engagement even though it would bring mortification to her, Announcing the pregnancy before the pregnancy and arranging a party to send  her rival packing, and, finally, telling a private version of events to her son.  Behind the conventional, child-like woman, Edith has created a steely shadow side, which Newland glimpses.  I think that's quite a feat for the author.  In some ways--and perhaps this reveals what a conventional person I am--May's the most interesting character in the book.]

B.B.

B.B.....

Wow, I couldn't agree with you more about May. (Age of Innocence by Wharton) There's something very manipulative about her which isn't innocent at all.  Actually I found that recognition somewhat chilling. She is the perfect product of her society, though. Think how they close ranks on Newland when they see him straying.  If you have the chance, read Roman Fever, to my mind Edith's best short story, and there's a moment at the end that is similarly chilling, and so brilliant.










Saturday, November 16, 2013

The Orchardist: Discussion

A small group--only five of us--were there to talk about this well-liked book.  One member called it a fairy tale.  And it does have those elements.  Two wandering orphans lost in the woods. A fairy godmother--the midwife herbalist.  A lonely grandfatherly figure a la Gepetto.  And a crueler than cruel evil villain.  

What it doesn't have are the fairy tale resolutions.  There is no Prince Charming to wake up the sleeping beauties.  (Although some characters attempt a princely, but  hare-brained rescue.)  The most evil character doesn't die through the cleverness of a Princess.  The Grandfather doesn't transform himself in order to save the young.  Disappointing, however, as one member put it--we would have criticized the book mercilessly if it had a happily ever after ending.

And so the book leaves you with unresolved questions but with an appreciation for the simple  life that followed the rhythms of the seasons--that  was once upon a time.




Saturday, October 26, 2013

Feeling as smug and self-satisfied as an ant scoffing at a lazy grasshopper....

Ordered all of the remaining 8 titles for the year and they are stacked in reading order on my bookshelf.  I am ready for a long winter. What about you?   Are you an ant or grasshopper?  Either way, know this --

Next up is:

The Orchardist  (linked to NPR review)

by Amanda Coplan


Saturday, October 19, 2013

The Yellow Birds by Kevin Powers: Discussion

Book:  Great. (Majority)
Discussion:  Okay.
Post:  Too short?  Sorry.



A poetic book telling the truth about a modern war--a war with no clear justification, goal, enemy, or heroes. Started by old men who never fought a war who had no exit plan, because they planned on staying there forever.  One member didn't want to read it due to the horror it would contain. And didn't come for the discussion. (She was encouraged to read it by a member who thought the book beautifully written; I'll let you know if she does.)  Another member came who disliked the book because of  its gruesomeness.

Everyone else thought the book captured what it must have felt like to be a young soldier in such a meaningless slaughter of innocence and youth. With beautiful language.

Minor issues:  The letter--was it a device or real?  What was Bartle's crime?  Should that have stayed a mystery?

Guilty that I hadn't finished the book in time and rushed through the last sections, I didn't offer this thought:  Does the poetic voice remove you from the horror and keep you as numb as the soldiers became?  Or was my speed reading keeping me from feeling the pain?

Politics entered the discussion:  Should there be a draft?  Would that prevent the U.S. from entering such wars in the future?  What has an all professional army done to the country and us?  Trained to be killers only; jobs that previously led to skilled worked performed by Halliburton--what is there for soldiers returning to civilian life?

Why was discussion okay?  Too much agreement.  We have to stop agreeing.