Total Pageviews

Thursday, December 25, 2014

Stephen King Discussion

I didn't attend the meeting.  And although, L.C. gave a detailed report...it had a lot of info about the author's life and notes on themes.  (See Below.) .I didn't get what I wanted to find out..and that is..

How did our members feel about Stephen King as a writer...was his work equal to other writings we have read as a group? Do we think King is a great writer of "pulp" fiction?  Or a writer whose works should  be taken more seriously? How many of us think his books will become enduring American literature?  Did his stories foment a  discussion?  Did his themes and subjects strike an emotional chord?

We often gravitate to the highbrow choices...is this lowbrow to me just because they are so popular? Is there something in his work that even the most elite "highbrow" (not me)  might benefit from?   I have an unformed opinion and would have loved to hear from others.  (I am easily influenced.)

Hope someone responds.

And someone did...B.B. Here are her comments:

It was a good discussion. Only eight present; so a feeling of intimacy and equally shared, unhurried conversation prevailed. Since time has passed, my comments here may reflect more my own ideas than the group’s. Both stories are morality plays of a sort. The first, “Rita Hayworth and the Shawshank Redemption,” is about the virtues of faith, hope and love. Indeed, the title of the section is “Hope Springs Eternal.” In the dehumanizing world of prison, Andy maintains faith in himself and the hope of escape. Once he is free, he reaches back in love to Red, leaving a trail for his friend to follow. Red is so diminished by his years in prison that he’s barely able to cope on the outside. What redeems him is the love Andy shows him. The story ends with Red setting out in faith and hope to start a new, good life.

The second story, “Apt Pupil,” has the section title “Summer of Corruption.” Here we see a bond between two males that is mutually destructive. This morality play is about evil and how evil corrupts. The boy Todd dabbles in evil, eventually becoming evil. He stirs up quiescent evil in Dussander, the old Nazi. Love redeems; evil corrupts.

Although the discussion was lively, we all, even GT, the sponsor of the book—who was sold on King’s writing memoir, greatly admiring his dedication to his craft and to his wife—said we wouldn’t care to read any more Stephen King in a hurry, not even the next two in the collection. The writing is masterful, but maybe morality plays aren’t our thing. Maybe we prefer less clear-cut themes, more character-driven stories with nuanced characters we can identify with or who help us understand real people in our lives. King’s characters seem to exist to work out his ideas. 


And, yet, I don’t want to dismiss King. He’ll always have an audience. I think maybe I would have enjoyed him more when I was younger. As you’ve hinted at, BT, his is not the genre for women like us—of a certain age and with decided tastes.

Notes:

L.'s Notes:

 G. said "How nice Stephen King is". M. said he's crazy.

His life:
His father ran off when he was 2 years old and he was raised by his mother and her relatives. He is very unpretentious and a sweet man. His mother had 'low class' jobs. He had an older brother. He lived in Maine and met his wife, Tabatha, at the university of Maine. She was a poet.


He had a teaching job and that left him the summer to write. He wrote Carrie as short story and then increased it to a novel; then a movie. He was paid $400,000.


Later, SK was addicted to alcohol and drugs. Tabatha invited everyone she knew over and she took out his bottles and his syringes and told him, "Please, this is unacceptable". SK went into rehab. It may have affected the writing of Misery. Tabatha said, 'you have to write' SK goes into his studio and turns on his stereo, very loud. He doesn't like giving autographs. He has a website where he sells shirts and the money goes to charity. He wrote the Shining and someone said that he makes references to the shining in all of his pieces.

In 1982 he wrote Shawshank Redemption and Apt Pupil. One goes up and the other down.


We got around to discussing evil and good. We decided that the Shawshank Redemption was two men on their way to redemption, and in the Apt Pupil, was a student and a man who are led down the path to evil. D. said 'evil is an addiction'. Apt Pupil discusses Todd's private life. Todd tries to escape evil sexually, but it doesn't work for him. Todd gives in to all his impulses.


His father is having an affair with his secretary. His mom is concerned about him, but his father writes it off. Another name for the title is "Summer of Corruption'.




SK had trouble with the movie, 'The Shining' as the movie is very different from the book. He has a way of writing the story with a number of views, someone said, I think it was D., that he did that in some paragraphs. We discussed that Alice McDermott and Virginia Wolfe do that. B.B. said he always tells stories with messages. J. said 'other wages of sin are death'.

We also discusses ,Thinner' a man who is distracted who inadvertently kills a man crossing the street and a gypsy woman told him that he's going to get thinner and thinner, which he does. After that we discussed the food coop, Sony and Cuba. And that's it, except for the parts I had to leave out.




Sunday, December 7, 2014

Next Up: Stephen King Different Seasons

December 17th:  First Two Stories

Rita Hayworth and Shawshank Redemption
Apt Pupil

Read the other two as well if you have time...

Guardian Review

Different Seasons - Stephen King




Thursday, November 27, 2014

Italian Shoes by Henning Mankell

Once you start analyzing a book in an objective way--does a book lose its power to move you?

When the sponsor of the book gave the background talk, it was clear that underlying the "text" she read, was the story of her formative year spent in Sweden--in the 1960s.  How lucky to find a book that connects deeply with your personal history.

Others enjoyed the book; but were able to point out flaws in this story about a man, Fredrik Wellin, who slowly and fitfully reawakens to life. Some felt that the second half of the book was implausible...two major events even disturbing and unnecessary.  We compared Fredrik to Kurt Wallander, Mankell's detective, and enjoyed noticing how similar they are.    And we enjoyed speculating about why the author seemed to be drawn to writing about  men who live in self-imposed isolation.

We got intellectual satisfaction from uncovering a possible connection between Mankell's mother's abandonment of  him and Mankell's creation of a character who despised his mother. (Oh...perhaps the abandonment of his first love...his deepest love...was the author's way of trying to come to grips with his own loss? his father's loss? Fredrik, the abandoner in this novel says: "There is no abandonment that can be excused or explained.  So I said nothing.")

 Connecting this character to Julian Barnes' Tony in A Sense of an Ending, was a heady discovery. And, also enjoyable was  sharing some of the clever ways Mankell created his characters, for example:  using a few sentences to sum up Wellin's  two marriages.

A good, fun discussion and mental exercise...

But, how much better if we all could have relived moving memories...

Hmmm...
Can anyone recommend a book set in Martha's Vineyard in the 1960s?

This comment from B.B.:  In our discussion of "Italian Shoes," we forgot to talk of Caravaggio. The main character's daughter was very taken with the painter and mention of him kept coming into the story. He, I find in a history of art book, was an outsider and a rough sort whose paintings, as opposed to the fashionable ideal, were gritty and real--like Mankel's works? 



Sunday, October 19, 2014

Discussion of No Great Mischief by Alistair MacLeod

A member, J.B.,  played three Scottish Highland tunes on her violin setting the mood for the discussion of this novel that memorializes a small group of Cape Breton immigrants and the large clan of descendants.  Members all loved the book and were moved by characters especially the grandparents and the narrator's older brother: Calum. Historic events give an outline to their story...but it is through the details about their interaction with the natural world of Cape Breton and each other that  readers come to learn about and care for these people.  Members remarked that the animal stories were particularly powerful.

Members also noted that  the  origin stories are passed down and  retold and how they become myths that each successive generation shares. Red hair, first names, dark eyes, strength of character, can all be traced back to their Scottish Clan's great great great grandfather.  Even the character traits of the author's childhood dog "caring too much and trying too hard"  is said to be inherited from its Scottish ancestor.

The narrator reads a slogan on a T-shirt:  "Living in the past is not living up to our potential."  Yet all of the characters are attached to their past, their history, and to each other.  Contrasting with modern isolation, the warmth of the past draws them back to Cape Breton in memory  and, whenever they can, in reality.  Potential?  The narrator and his sister...the lucky/unlucky ones... reached success in the modern world...but whenever the reader glimpses that modern world it seems empty.

Although a British General James Wolf said that it was no great mischief if the Highlanders fell in battle; thus the title, each death, each disappearance in this novel feels a great loss to the reader.

Highly recommended by all.

Oh by the way:  Margaret Laurence's book: The Diviners mentioned in No Great Mischief is highly recommended by a member:  J.P.



And...we now are challenging ourselves to come up with musical intros to each book...glad it isn't food as some groups I have heard of do!

Found this book club review...


Thursday, September 25, 2014

Book List for 2014-2015

Front Cover

  No Great Mischief by Alistair MacLeod
  October 15th









Italian Shoes by Henning Mankell

November 19th

Italian Shoes

Different Seasons by Stephen King

December 17th

Seasonsking.jpg

Visitation Street by Ivy Pochoda

January 21st

Visitation Street by Ivy Pochoda


A Constellation of Vital Phenomena by Anthony Marra

February 25th

A Constellation of Vital Phenomena


Dubliners by James Joyce

March 25th


Family Life by Akhil Sharma

April 22nd

book cover

Summary

Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage by Haruki Murakami 

May 20th

Colorless Tsukuru Tazaki and His Years of Pilgrimage


Hare with Amber Eyes by Edmund De Waal 

June 17th

7821828

Saturday, August 16, 2014

Saturday, June 21, 2014

The Tennis Partner: Discussion Notes

A small group came out of the heat to meet in the sponsor's cool living room to talk about this well-liked book.  Some highlights:

Male friendships, like that of the author and his tennis partner, seem to revolve around neutral things such as sports--to talk about the personal, the intimate is difficult for that gender.

To a group of mostly non-tennis plays, the descriptions of tennis strategies are so well written that they enhance the understanding of the author and his partner's characters.

Addictions are pleasurable...and so, despite the horrendous consequences, people return to them.  Seems obvious, right?  But as a group whose addictions do not have such negative impact, this is an idea that has to be restated.  The "Just say NO" philosophy is a joke for a good reason--not just because of its author.

Insights into medical descriptions disrupt the flow  for one book group member,  but not to others.

Friendships are not free of rivalry, jealousy, envy, anger...

It is through the description of his relationships with his patients and his sons,  that Abraham's best qualities are revealed.






Tuesday, May 27, 2014

Old Filth: Discussion

No need to read the blog.  Just read the book jacket reviews.  That's how positively the group reacted to this beautifully rendered, moving novel.   Everyone was thrilled to learn that--Old Filth is one of a trilogy. Each of the other two books focuses on a character introduced in Old Filth. And despite one negative hearsay review about the third; it looks like both books will make our summer reading lists.

Waited too long to write this blurb to write about themes discussed.  Left my book with notes with a younger reader. (In 40's.)  She didn't seem to get hooked.  So this will be short.

Here is link:
Barnes and Nobles Review



Friday, April 25, 2014

I Await The Devil's Coming by Mary MacLane: Discussion

Selected by the sponsor because of its historical importance not its readability:  published in 1902,  it is a memoir of a sensual, bisexual 19-year old who rejected conventional morality and gender roles. What is the context that not only allowed it to be published but resulted in one hundred thousand copies being sold within the first few months of its publication?   What were the young women who purchased the book longing for? What were their elders feeling toward them?

Not an easy to read book, the sponsor had to reread it a second time to appreciate it. She wasn't the only one.  Why?  Not so much a difficult read as a read that tests your ability to tolerate a narcissist.    As a 19 year old, Mary MacLane is a self-absorbed  adolescent with manic highs and suicidal lows. Unable to love or be loved by her family--she states that her mother likes her in much the way a hen cares for its egg--she grandiosely and repeatedly--calls herself a genius.  

Turns out that MacLane wrote a second memoir published in 1917.  And it turns out that one book grouper read it.  Well we wondered what was it like.   B.B.reported that Mary MacLane grew as a writer, but seemed to be as unable to form relationships as ever.  Sadly, and clearly, MacLane turned off people as much as she was turned off by them.  And if you are impatient or intolerant of her grandiosity,  she turns off the reader.

What are the positives?  Mixed in the tedium are  touches of humor and interesting portraits of Montana characters.  And of course an honest portrait of a young woman  at the turn of the 19th century. And some really good imagery and writing.  And a glimpse into the beginning of a literary genre.  And too, material for a good discussion.

Themes:  Willa Cather vs. MacLane--similar backdrops for their youth--yet the former writer created novels.  If MacLane had used her writerly skills to develop her character studies into novels would she have had longer lasting fame and success? Alice Munro may have been impacted by similar upbringing and she deals with the theme of isolation. Again; whatever stunted MacLane as a human being, stunted her ability to deal with themes that would have made her genius more accessible to others.  And this idea:  MacLane was born before her time: if she had lived today her writing style and her self-absorption  would have made her a good--well--BLOGGER.  Yikes!  Gotta take up knitting.

Sunday, March 16, 2014

More Comments on Are You My Mother? this time from R.M.

I was very taken with reading your blog posting and B. B's blog posting.  Boy, am I sorry that I missed the meeting!!  I do agree with B B that when having a discussion of a book (any book) the best way to start is to voice the positive aspects of the book.  An exciting meeting, however, doesn't have to be all positive and some of the best meetings were those where the members disagreed (sometimes very strongly).  What bothers me most is that the group seems to have taken the message of the book itself and made it a personal rebuke against THEM rather than to see how the author was influenced by these analysts in HER story. We often veer off into personal stories and ideas, but then we always return to the book.    I am not knowledgeable about these analysts and their theories (here's where KK would have been a great help), but I don't think that they were what made the book less than a true pleasure for me. I actually did not LIKE the person who wrote the book (about herself), and so I was not fully engaged.  I think that it is important to find something likable or interesting about a character (in this case the author--since it is a memoir) in order to fully enjoy a book.

True R.  I think any person willing to reveal all of their flaws in the hopes of gaining peace and understanding is interesting and someone to admire. Thus my being moved by both books.

B. 

Friday, March 14, 2014

B.B.'s Post on Bechdel and Book Group Discussions...


I woke up the morning after Book Group with a bad “morning after” feeling and the thought that I owed the sponsor an apology.  Once upon a time--after a miffed sponsor walked out on us--our  group agreed to discuss books on their merits and save negative reactions to the end.  From time to time, we seem to have to learn all over again to approach discussion as respectfully as if the sponsor's grown child had written the book.

Last night I joined the others in a defensive crouch practically chanting: I HATE THIS BOOK.  Now that we are the mothers of adult children, we couldn’t bear reading a memoir that puts a mother not all that much older than ourselves in the wrong.  We busied ourselves defending our own mothers and ourselves as mothers rather than giving the book its due.  We criticized the book for its narrow focus.  We concluded that Bechdel is all wrapped up in herself.  Unfair.  This is a memoir about herself and her mother.  She did not need to talk about her—very successful—career or other aspects of her life.  That’s not what the memoir was about.
 
Actually, this book has a lot to offer.  It’s richly textured, going back and forth in time and incorporating dreams, literature and psychological theory.  It quotes extensively from Winnicott and from Alice Walker, author of The Gifted Child.  Virginia Woolf and Adrienne Rich have cameo roles.  Each chapter begins with a nightmare, signaled visually by black borders.  A lot, in fact, is signaled visually—jagged-edged bubbles for phone conversations, for instance.

My argument with Winnicott is that he would not have given me the encouragement and support I sought as a new mother.  Also, his relationships with his own mother and with his first wife were sadly flawed.  So, I'm glad I didn't encounter him in the 1970's, but that’s no reason to avoid him now.  And he makes very interesting points.  The false self versus the true self afflicts us all to some degree.  Otherwise, we’d go around like four-year-olds or senile folks with no sense of propriety.  When the false self becomes dominant in a child’s development, however, her true self may not be given the chance to properly develop.  If a mother—perhaps a mentally or physically sick one—uses the child to mother her and the child complies, then the child may never be able to see herself as a separate person.  That’s why juvenile delinquency may be a healthier response than nerdy compliance.  (Although the compliant child may make a dandy therapist! (See page 149.)

KK, you were sorely missed!.  Ditto you, RK, who said over the phone that you hadn't expected to like the book but did and thought it had universal appeal.




Thursday, March 13, 2014

Are You My Mother? Book Discussion

I knew it was not a hit when I got...hit...literally with the book.  A slap on the wrist, but a physical hit anyway.  Tired and unprepared...this sponsor thought the meeting was the following week--should have read the blog!

It all started in September when I brought both of Bechdel's books to recommend.  50-50.  I went with this instead of the more positively reviewed Fun Home because I thought the theme of Motherhood would resonate more with our group.   As I scanned the book hours before the meeting--I was going to leisurely reread it over the weekend, I could remember how dense the psychological passages were.  And that is where the book was hit hardest by members.

The hypotheses that Winnicott came up with were male oriented analysis of motherhood.  One that this group from the 1960s and 70s railed against in their struggles to define their role as mothers and women. Couldn't defend him very well--because some of his ideas are bizarre and pedantic and obscure--but he got the transitional object thing down among others.[  I did say you could read this book differently...like the Magic School Bus Books(such a science teacher)--you don't have to read all of the dense text...you can focus on the dialogue and the art.]

That's not all!  Members disliked Bechdel and her coming of age angst that lasted til she was in her menopausal 40s and possibly beyond.  They hated that she  was  still struggling to connect with her mother  and regain the intimacy they shared when she was 3 months old.   They commiserated with the mother who just didn't want to face her husband's tragic life or become intimately involved with her daughter's adult life.  "It's none of my business."  A phrase that members' mothers used or implied.  After a certain age, it is time to separate from your children.






Please note that not all members disliked the book.  But only a handful did like it--25--33% of the entire group?--and even those with some reservations.  Those who liked it, appreciated the creativity of the format and speculated about the future bringing more books written in graphic style.

To those who thought I was upset about the strongly negative reviews, please be assured that I am not upset...book group is a risky business and not for the faint of heart.  I was tired, and annoyed with myself for not being better prepared; that I didn't bring more to the meeting.  What would I have done differently? Reread the book a week in advance.  Researched Winnicott (sp?). I was depending on K.K. to help with the psychology stuff.   Read reviews and brought that analysis to the meeting.  (One review likens Bechdel to Woody Allen--another reason to dislike her?)  Changed my recommendation to Fun Home.  Brought some of her comic strips...Here is a link:


Link to Dykes to Watch out For


Friday, February 14, 2014

A Sense of an Ending and B.B.'s Parish Book Group

After reading “A Sense of an Ending" with the Sixth Street Book Group, I recommended it to our parish group.  A day or two before we met, a fellow member asked why in the world I’d recommended that book.  So I had to think about why I think it has religious themes.  It occurred to me that one parallel is the story of the Pharisee and the tax collector.  The former goes into the Temple, marches up front and says, “Thank you, God, for not making me like other men—such as that tax collector.” The tax collector stays at the rear, beating his breast and saying, “Forgive me, Lord, for I am a sinner.”


Tony starts out like the Pharisee and ends up like the tax collector.  His life is neat and tidy, no mess.  He sees himself as a decent man.  In the course of the story he comes to realize that he has never loved anyone.  He threw Veronica over because he thought she and her family looked down on him.  When the American girl he hitchhiked with said “Easy come, easy go” it didn’t occur to him until much later that maybe this was a question rather than a comment. 

 When his unfaithful ex-wife suggested they might reunite, he thought the idea too “odd” to carry through on—besides, he’s become content living alone.  When Tony finally rereads the hateful letter he wrote to Adrian and Veronica he can no longer pretend that it was a mild rebuke and not a curse.  

All along, Veronica has been saying Tony “doesn’t get it.” When epiphany finally comes, he’s no longer complacent.  Instead, reprising a school chum’s assessment of history, there’s “unrest, great unrest.”  It’s not that Tony is completely responsible for what went wrong, but like a world war there’s a chain of causes and he comes to realize that he’s a link in the chain.  He’s not better than other men, after all, and as much in need of mercy as anyone else.

I Curse the River of Time: Discussion update 2/15/14 with comment from B.B.

The beauty of a book group filled with bright, insightful women is that discussion leads to deeper understanding and appreciation of a book--even one that you might not  like. Not that the majority didn't like the book; most did.  But what individuals say during a meeting can make a difference in how you relate to the book's characters and ultimately how you feel about the book. And I think this was true for I Curse The River of Time.

Another great feature of our book group is the sponsor's intro which often gives some clarity as to the author's demons, motivations, and themes.  J.B. honed in on this biographical fact--Petterson's mother read his first novel and said it was childish.  A week later she was dead along with his father, brother, and nephew in a ferry accident.  Could that harsh statement have haunted Petterson into writing this novel?  

  Petterson interview.

Image of Per Petterson

Members had lots to discuss about this novel about a 37 year old not quite adult, well childish, man--Arvid--and his dying mother, his dying marriage, and his dying dream for a communistic worker's paradise.  (Not as dark as it sounds--the November mood was lightened a bit with bitter sweet poignancy and even some comic situations--well comic to some.) The flow of talk didn't stop or veer off from figuring out just what this book meant to us.  

Still longing to be his mother's favorite son, Arvid, seems to overlook or minimize the evidence that he might be. There was quite a lot of evidence as one member pointed out and she triggered a whole list...He was the only son who was planned, who shared the love of reading with his mother,who as a child would rise early to share early mornings with her, who could come into her presence and she would know it was him without even looking.

I guess despite the fact that his mother loved him--it wasn't enough, because she didn't idolize him; she knew him too well.  She knew he wasn't the one who triggered the divorce; she knew he was naive enough to think staying in the working class would be a heroic act; she didn't think about him every day as she did about her son who died. (Why would she? asked a member...She knew he was alive and okay.)  

Arvid at 37 did not have the life he dreamed of having.  Yet some felt that he would be redeemed just because he could be so brutally honest about who he was.  And that his depths of despair will lead him into a more evolved, Arvid--the Arvid who is the narrator. 

Themes & Misc.  

The river of time--Because even though a mighty river like the Rio Grande could dry up and be crossed--(read the novel to if this  metaphor doesn't quite make sense)--we can't go back to undo, redo, relive, reconnect. We are  flowing  along with time in one direction only and missed opportunities  are missed forever. 

Families--especially Scandinavian ones in winter? can't talk about painful secrets, hidden shames, regrets, and or even, strong feelings of love.  They speak through actions--a shared Napoleon pastry, the sharing of a brandy.

Hemingway and Faulkner influence in writing style.

Others were mentioned, but alas, I regret almost to the point of cursing, that I did not take notes this time. So if you like, send them in comments.  I will post.

YEAH:  The other B (BB) reports...

We did talk briefly of the transcendence Arvid yearns for, seeks and at times attains.  He envies what he sees in a group of young Christians, but, because he doesn’t believe in God, he doesn’t join them.  He becomes intrigued with the teachings of Mao and quits college to immerse himself in the working class.  In one scene, he feels himself part of a we (the italics are the author's), only one humble man but a part of all humanity.  His mother called him an idiot and his wife a child, but perhaps it takes a simpleton or child to attain mystical heights.  And maybe that compensates for the loss of material success. 

And if we see Arvid as a stand-in for the author—as members of our group proposed—then perhaps there’s the suggestion that artistic success compensates for failure in other aspects of life.











Friday, January 17, 2014

Discussion of The Messiah of Stockholm by Cynthia Ozick

A number of coincidences:  the second book of the year that was found on a Park Slope stoop.(No Kindles left out yet; only paper versions.)  The second book in a row about a real author--Bruno Schulz. Last month was Edith Wharton.   (Although that isn't so unusual others pointed out...we read a fictionalized version of Henry James.)  And, perhaps, the most surprising of all, one of the book group members relatives came from and died in Drohobych? Drogobych? Poland as did Bruno Schulz.


At once direct and arcane ... a self-portrait drawing by Bruno Schulz

What was the overall impression of the book?  Darkly funny short novel about a Swedish critic, Lars Andemening, who believes that he is the son of Bruno Schulz.  An abruptly ended short novel to some.  The themes--how humans are affected (or not) by great art or literature.  How obsessions can take over a life and lead to an exalted state that destroys ordinary relationships.( The critic has no friends, has to choose between having a typewriter or clean socks, his two wives stopped liking him fairly soon, and even his daughter is lost to him.)  How the search for The Messiah (Schulz's  lost novel and, possibly, the savior as well? B.B. We missed your input into spiritual matters--what is the significance of Lars' other name--Lazarus Baruch)  can lead to a kind of wonderful madness.   But once The Messiah is  found, the fevered search ended, the madness is gone, life becomes predictably comfortable and, alas, for Lars, mediocre.

One member couldn't purchase the  book, so she read the short story Dictation by Ozick.  Similarly, it is about great literature and writers--Henry James and Joseph Conrad--as they appear to their typists--typewriters.  And similarly the typists  believe themselves to be more connected/more important to these great geniuses than they actually are.   And they worship the writers and neglect their own lives and souls.

Another member got the book literally, but not figuratively.  Others said that was because she read the book once; they didn't get the book until they read it two times.  Intrigued, some members wondered if Bruno Schulz's existing works were readable. One member read it and felt that they were too phantasmagoric. Another member wondered if the style of  Messiah of Stockholm was written to imitate Schulz's writings. Other themes touched on--the difficulty of being an immigrant.

Thinking of getting Street of Crocodiles  by Schulz to see for myself.